Full Gospel Mission Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943233302
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Hayward, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5105377338
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $238,335
- Expenses
- $231,970
- Assets
- $29,616
- Liabilities
- $327,709
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Quillen (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Thomas Quillen (President): $39,000 total reported compensation
- Iva Quillen (CFO): $30,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of FGMM is to provide Christian counseling, education, training, and rehabilitation to victims of substance abuse and to victims of addictive behavior problems. The gospel of Jesus Christ is the foundation of this organization. We will present the gift of rehabilitation to victims of substance abuse and to victims of addictive behavior problems. The gospel of Jesus Christ is the foundation of this organization. We will present the gift of salvation to the lost, and feed and clothe the needy. We consider the following of Biblical Principles as essential to our success.
What it reported doing in 2016
Through our residential recovery program we housed, clothed, fed, counseled and provided vocational training to 8 men and women in 2016. The medical and any court related needs of the residents were satisfied by Mission Ministries in that we provided transportation to and from all appointments. All required court related classes and or programs were attended by the appointed residents and transportation was provided by Full Gospel Mission Ministries. Through a voucher program, clothing and furniture is given freely to individuals and families in need. Graduates from our residential program, freely received all the furniture they needed to furnish their new independent residence. More than 50 individuals received free Xlike new" clothing from our Thrift Store. More than 40 families received free furniture for their homes.A local hospital (St. Rose) was a recipient of free wheel chairs, walker, etc for needy patients who could not afford to purchase those items upon leaving the hospital. Other non-profit agencies (Victory Outreach, Teen Challenge, Seven Step and local churches) used our Thrift Store to receive free merchandise for many of their clients.For our Hands That Care ministry we provided (through food supplied by the Alameda County Food Bank) more than 50 needy families per month with groceries. A soup kitchen was provided for the needy of our communities five days each week, and more than 225 people per week received a free hot lunch. In our annual Thanksgiving dinner more than 150 people received food baskets and a hot meal on Wednesday before Thanksgiving. Over 400 children received new toys for Christmas at our annual Christmas toy giveaway.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 11.07; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -50.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -49.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $203K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $39K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.