Full Circle Mo Feral
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862289826
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3142005838
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Other Services - Specialty Animals
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,803
- Expenses
- $87,918
- Assets
- $66,853
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christina Rutz (founder/president)
People named in this filing
- Christina Rutz (founder/president)
- greg felix (board member treasurer)
- Mark Hrabovsky (board director transport)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Full Circle MO Feral is to help facilitate TNR trappers and the community with networking kittens and friendly community cats into licensed rescue placement and spay and neutering the unaltered fractious adults through Trap Neuter Vaccinate Return to halt the continued breeding and suffering of community feral cats.
What it reported doing in 2025
Full Circle MO Feral maintains a website that contains information about the organization's mission, as well as information for visitors who encounter kittens entering kittens , website provides articles and instructions on what to do when encountering kittens establishing how old they are and if suitable age to be removed from mother cat or to wait until older. we guide TNR trappers and the community to enable them to successfully get the kittens and friendly cats into licensed rescue placement while insuring the mother cat and any other unfixed community cats that are not suitable for rescue goes through a TNR spay and neuter program supplies of traps, crates, and feral cat dens are purchased for community use.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.2%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 71.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 46.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 67.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $88K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.