Fulbright University Vietnam USA Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455152480
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Needham, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7812924710
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,006,154
- Expenses
- $3,483,846
- Assets
- $1,594,286
- Liabilities
- $424,988
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BENJAMIN WILKINSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD CLERK)
Highest reported compensation
- BENJAMIN WILKINSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD CLERK): $245,733 total reported compensation
- PETER WELSH (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $221,432 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fulbright university vietnam USA, inc. (fuv USA) was founded to support the development of well-governed, higher education institutions that respond to vietnam's acute demand for human and knowledge capital and that advance exchange and collaboration between the united states and vietnam. Fuv USA plays a leadership role in the ongoing development of fulbright university vietnam (fuv). Fuv USA is dedicated to supporting fuv's emergence as an innovative, financially sustainable vietnamese academic institution, founded on principles of good governance and committed to academic freedom and intellectual pluralism.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fuvusa supports institutional innovation in vietnamese higher education. We pursue this mission primarily through our participation in the fulbright university vietnam (fuv) initiative, vietnam's first private, nonprofit university. Fuv is being built on the principles of transparency, accountability, academic freedom, and meritocracy. Fuvusa contributes to fuv by serving as the university's highest governing authority, as a "systems integrator" connecting fuv with global knowledge networks and partners, and as a mobilizer of financial resources for the project. Fuvusa stewards much of the federal funding that is catalyzing fuv's initial growth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 92%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $27.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 92% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $246K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $314K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.