Frontline Resurrection

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850508100
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5055825901
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$750,091
Expenses
$736,307
Assets
$86,017
Liabilities
$16,311

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RENEE CHAVEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CHRIS CLEVELAND (PRESIDENT)
  • CHARLES ARAGON (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TOMAS E MAES (TREASURER): $52,600 total reported compensation
  • RENEE CHAVEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $38,564 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

FLR is focused on providing a safe and sober living environment that will allow women to heal from trauma, addiction, incarceration and other life disturbances while engaging in comprehensive services to empower them to live independently.

What it reported doing in 2024

Direct Services: provide emotional and social support to individuals dealing with similar issues. The Reset Program is an eviction prevention, move-in, and utility assitance program designed to assist justice involved community members to find, get & keep housing (336 people served). Project Transformation is a non-traditional leadership program that creates reentry pathways through career development, education, certification & continuing education (325 people served). The Equine & Gardening program serves women who have high levels of trauma, incarceration & substance abuse history by spending time with our rescue animals in a safe & calm environment(40 people served). The Peer Wellness Center is open to individuals who are needing support & direction in their personal life recovery from all stages of change (2653 people served).

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 44
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 89.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 84.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 74.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $676K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.