Frontline Policy Action Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863969505
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Newnan, GA, USA
- Phone
- 3305100553
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,430
- Expenses
- $111,933
- Assets
- $134,520
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID MUZIO (President/Treas)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER OSTENSON (Secretary)
- REBECCA CARTWRIGHT (Director)
- ROBERT BAGGETT (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Frontline Policy Action, Inc. is to fulfill the biblical mandate to love God and love our neighbor by electing statesmen, boldly engaging the culture, and advocating for God-honoring public policy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Frontline Policy Action exists to glorify God in the public square by advancing a bold, biblical standard for public policy, elections, and cultural engagement.In fiscal year ending 6/30/25, FPA fulfilled this mission through the following activities:- Advancing pro-family and faith based legislation and policy initiatives at the state level that protected life, religious liberty, parental rights, and educational freedom;- Endorsed and supported candidates for public office who champion biblical values, engaged in targeted outreach and mobilization efforts in key districts across Georgia;- Communicated with voters and constituents through direct mail, digital campaigns, and live events to deliver truthful information about policy issues and public officials;- Equipped and encouraged civic participation aligned with Christian conservative values.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.4%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.4% of revenue deployed · 73.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.