Froedtert South
Legal name: Froedtert South Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390816845
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Kenosha, WI, USA
- Phone
- (855) 241-9952
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $486,946,600
- Expenses
- $466,789,306
- Assets
- $727,819,306
- Liabilities
- $88,565,882
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD O SCHMIDT JR (PRESIDENT/CEO/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- RICHARD O SCHMIDT JR (PRESIDENT/CEO/DIRECTOR): $1,876,820 total reported compensation
- DAVID A KNIGHT (PHYSICIAN): $1,322,415 total reported compensation
- BRIAN C HILL (PHYSICIAN): $1,108,652 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Froedtert south, inc. Is committed to living out the healing ministries of the judeo-christian faiths by providing exceptional and compassionate healthcare services that promotes the dignity and well-being of the people we serve. This is our mission and our reason for being. We strive to recruit and retain the best physicians and staff and purchase the best diagnostic and curative medical equipment that our financial resources will permit. We also strive to be accessible to all members of our community with emergent and urgent healthcare needs, irrespective of their ability to pay. This is our commitment to the quality, accessibility and affordability fundamentals affecting the delivery of healthcare.
What it reported doing in 2024
Acute care hospital that provides inpatient, outpatient, and emergency care services to its community. 2024 charity care $4,469,756. Charity care is defined as free or discounted health services provided to those who cannot afford to pay and who meet all criteria for financial assistance. Charity care is based on actual costs, not charges, and does not include bad debt. Unreimbursed cost of public programs $38,190,739. Unreimbursed cost of public programs is defined as the shortfall experienced when payments received are below the cost of treating public beneficiaries through medicaid and other local public programs. Community health improvement services $518,354. Community health improvement services are defined as clinical and non-clinical services designed to improve community health, which are provided to the community for free or for fees that did not cover costs. Financial contributions $3,760. Financial contributions are defined as contributions, including cash, non-cash items such as food, furniture, equipment, supplies, and loaned staff for volunteer and charitable purposes, made to individuals, community groups, or nonprofit organizations for charitable purposes. Health professions education $4,700. Health professions education is defined as direct costs incurred for accredited training and education programs for physicians, nurses, allied health professionals and technicians (does not include ongoing education for staff). Community building activities $340,270. Community building activities are defined as programs that, while not directly related to health care, provide opportunities to address the root causes of health problems, such as poverty, homelessness, and environmental issues. Costs for these activities include cash and in-kind donations. Community benefit operations $1,410. Community benefit operations are defined as costs associated with dedicated staff and community health needs and/or assets assessment, as well as, other costs associated with community benefit strategy and operations. Total benefit to the community for 2024 $43,528,989.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 61.5%; rating input score 62; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $421.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 23 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $23.4M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.