Friendship House of Christian Service Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810300497
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Billings, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4062595569
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,858,545
- Expenses
- $1,551,392
- Assets
- $3,067,494
- Liabilities
- $184,381
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RUSS FAGG (Vice President)
- TIM MASCARENA (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- JENA HUCK (Director)
- SHAWNA BONINI (Director)
- JOHN VONDRA (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To reflct the love of jesus christ by fostering renewal, stability, and transformation in the lives of children and families in southside billings.
What it reported doing in 2024
FOSTERING RENEWAL, STABILITY, AND TRANSFORMATION IN THE LIVES OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, AND PROVIDING PROGRAMMING AND SERVICES TO EMPOWER YOUTH AND FAMILIESFriendship House of Christian Service was started by a coalition of downtown Billings'churches in 1957 to provide essential services to the impoverished andunder-resourced children and families living on Billings' south side. Over the years , the mission of Friendship House has remained constant: "Reflecting the Love of Jesus Christ to foster renewal, stability and transformation in the lives of children and families in South Billings." Our overarching goal is to break the cycle of generational poverty through education, investment and access to essential services. We seek to provide holistic community development and build leaders through serving at-risk and low-income children and families. Because our goal requires tremendous buy-in from our enrollees, we strive to develop long lasting friendship with children and families we serve through compassion, care and accountability . By offering services for ages 4-104 since 1957, we truly have become the foundation that allows our clients to grow into successful leaders.The five core programs we use to achieve this goal include our: Preschool- f or 4-5year old children, Youth-Afterschool/Summer Enrichment Programs for K-6th gradestudents, Teen- Programming for 13-19 year olds including open gym and Cafe', Parent/Caregiver/Adult Support Programming- educational classes, and Counseling- for all age levels, individuals and families . Because of the tremendous support of our donors, grantors, contractors and endowment, we have found tremendous success in working to increase school readiness by 100% in Preschoolers, K-6th grade student academic test scores have increased 17%, student social growth has improved 10%, student emotional growth increased 13%, parental support classes have educated over 300 this year, access to food resources has grown by 10%, neighborhood teen social and emotional support rose by 100% and we provided over 1,000 hours of counseling this year.We are not a franchise of a national organization; rather we are a homegrownBillings, Montana community response to meeting our community's deepest needs. We have a local board of directors from the various sectors of the Billings community and maintain local control of our work. We do not proselytize, rather we share God's love through acts of service that earn us the right to invest in lives challenged bypoverty and brokenness. While we are a part of several local, statewide, nationwideand worldwide affinity groups that support and encourage our work to theunder-resourced, we are independent and can serve where our community has the mostimmediate need. We have the support of more than 75 businesses and 40 churches andmore than 25 partner agencies that encourage our work with contributions, volunteersand donations. We are truly making great strides in developing our community, building leaders and are meeting and exceeding our goals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.4%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.4% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.