Friends of the Spartanburg County Public Library

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570676988
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Spartanburg, SC, USA
Phone
8645963507
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,459,318
Expenses
$1,356,793
Assets
$171,996
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHERYL MONSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JERRY COGAN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • JIM CROCKER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MAC DAVIS (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization exists to foster a closer relationship between the spartanburg county public library system and the community it serves; to promote informed public awareness of the library system's resources, programs, and needs; to support the library system through gifts, endowments, and contributions; to assist in the development of expanded and improved library services and facilities for spartanburg county; and to advocate for the library system's continued growth and sustainability.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization provides direct financial support to the spartanburg county public library system ("library system") in furtherance of its mission to enhance and expand library services and facilities available to the spartanburg county community. During the fiscal year, the organization made grants and allocations to the library system totaling $1,309,038.the most significant activity during the year was the acquisition and donation of the 2nd spartan regiment battle flag, a revolutionary war-era artifact with direct historical significance to spartanburg, South Carolina. The library system's board of trustees voted to contribute $1,200,000 to the organization specifically to fund this acquisition. The friends' board of directors separately voted to authorize the purchase, with the library system's director recused from that vote due to his institutional affiliation, and designated the county librarian as its authorized signing representative solely for purposes of executing the purchase agreement. The organization purchased the flag from its private owners and immediately donated it to the library system for permanent public display, consistent with the american revolution 250th anniversary programmatic initiative. The organization retained no ownership interest in the artifact and derived no economic benefit from the transaction.additional grants made during the year supported reading and literacy programs for children, youth, and adults across the library system's branch locations; recognition and appreciation activities for library system staff and volunteers whose contributions fall outside the library system's operating budget; capital project contributions including the headquarters planetarium project; and the purchase of collection items donated directly to the library system upon acquisition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.7%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 99.6%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.7% of revenue deployed · 99.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.