Friends of the Otisville School Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
812711662
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Otisville, NY, USA
Phone
8454126060
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,154
Expenses
$45,464
Assets
$332,822
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daphne M Charney Duggan (Vice President)
  • Alison Miller (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kenneth Pinkela (Director)
  • Daphne M Charney Duggan (Vice President)
  • Alison Miller (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A locally organized non profit organization whose sole purpose is the preservation and rehabilitation of the Old Otisville School and to Create a Cultural, Artistic, Education and Recreation Center for the community, the area and the region.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization supported community events on the property, providing cultural and educational programs via local organizations and cooperative extension groups. THe organization helped save a local small business at the same time meet a strategic goal to help provide child day care and youth activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.6%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 55.5%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.32; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 72.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.