Friends of the Oakland Fox Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943348426
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Pleasant Hill, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5108693519
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $7,954
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- PHIL TAGAMI (Pres of Board)
- SKYLER SANDERS (Secretary)
- LEN EPSTEIN (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Friends of the oakland fox inc's mission is to preserve and sustain the historic fox oakland theatre as a cultural resource, arts and education facility. Working in concert with similar cultural and economic organizations locally and regionally, foof will help to endure that this key asset attracts.
What it reported doing in 2023
Friends Of The Oakland Fox Inc CONDUCTS REGULAR TOURS FOR THE PUBLIC, FOR PRIVATE CORPORATIONS, STUDENT GROUPS, HISTORICAL GROUP AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS, SHOWCASING THE THEATHER AND THE BENEFITS THAT IT HAS BROUGHT TO THE CITY OF OAKLAND. BESIDES, Friends Of The Oakland Fox Inc was integral to the restoration of the fox theater and supported the revival of the uptown district.Friends Of The Oakland Fox Inc also fundraised for the Grove Shafter Garden Project in order to deter illegal dumping and the community mural project in order to deter graffiti in the area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.