Friends of the Montebello Unified School District Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383878668
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Montebello, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3235179402
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,130
- Expenses
- $59,696
- Assets
- $213,752
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD TORRES (President)
- WILLIAM LOOSE (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LAVONNE SHERMAN (Secretary)
- RICHARD TORRES (President)
- EDWARD FRANCO (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Founded in 2012, the Friends of Montebello Unified School District Foundations purpose is to raise funds to meet school district needs that are not covered by their budget. We raise funds in the community by soliciting companies and individuals to attend or partake in one of our many events. There are many school activities and/or programs that in the past had sufficient funds from the school district to prosper and thrive. With budgets shrinking the district has had to make many tough decisions about what programs to keep and what programs to cut from funding. That leaves willing students from displaying or nurturing their many talents in a safe environment. Thats where we come in. Those programs that have lost funding will solicit us for funds to continue their activities. Being a relatively new foundation, we are still trying to build recognition and respect within our community. As we build more credibility and recognition we hope to reach every school within the Montebello Unified
What it reported doing in 2022
See Schedule O
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.8%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.58; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.