Friends of the Jimmy Everest Center Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991864018
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Phone
4058339824
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,022
Expenses
$50,815
Assets
$115,207

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THERESA GREEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • THERESA GREEN (PRESIDENT)
  • NICKY WEBB (SECRETARY)
  • JACKIE PETERSON (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to positively impact the lives of Oklahoma children fighting cancer and their families, helping them get a break from the rigors of treatment several times a year while fostering friendship and support amont these patients and families. We provide opportunities for these patients, their siblings and parents to escape the world of cancer treatment, to be together as a family, and to share time with other families also facing childhood cancer, building connections and support by hosting several family social events.

What it reported doing in 2024

Utilizing 1822 volunteer hours of donated time, we hosted social events for families of Oklahoma children experiencing cancer treatment, including summer smash, horsin' around remington, race or time north, race for time south, car show and fun fest, and frozen holiday event. We also served 609 childhood cancer patients by providing 211 parent support packages, serving 1529 meals and handing out 3072 toys/prizes/gifts for cancer patients and their siblings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 26.6%; rating input score 27
  • Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 69.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 26.6% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.