Friends of the Institute of Noetic Sciences Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133663034
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2129671100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $298
- Assets
- $7,122
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KURT JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- MITCHELL J RABIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RICK ULFIK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KURT JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- MITCHELL J RABIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RICK ULFIK (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and engage in research and educational programs into the area of man's relationship to himself, his society and his universe, including both the physical and metaphysical realms. To explore the meaning of consciousness in its many forms. It is inspired by the epiphany dr. Edgar mitchell had on his return from the moon in 1971; an experience of universal connectedness.
What it reported doing in 2024
Planning and carrying out educational events, separately and in coordination with other organizations, to present speakers and create to facilitate the understanding of universal connectedness and consciousness for the general public. In 2016, the organization sponsored two events; one a panel discussion on altruism and the other epiphany: a conscious perspective on politics. The audience varied from 50 to 100 people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.9; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -27.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.