Friends of the Center for Individual Development Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330200282
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9093845426
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,695
- Expenses
- $7,025
- Assets
- $183,585
- Liabilities
- $3,200
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Delores Bader (President)
- Cynthia Alvarado-Crawford (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Andy Miller (Board Member)
- Chris Hudkins (Board Member)
- Susan Estrada (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to promote and raise funds for the Center for Individual Development center within the community.
What it reported doing in 2023
Friends of the C.I.D. has successfully raised funds that allow the C.I.D. to continue aquatic programs for people with disabilities. These programs include Teen Club after school recreation for youth and young adults with developmental disabilities, Merri-Mixers, a group for adults with developmental disabbilities, Twinges in the Hinges aquatic exercise program for adults with arthritis and other physical disabilities, and a social/recreation program. Other accomplishments include helping to promote the C.I.D. to develop community support by paying for memberships in the Chamber of Commerce, and developing an endowment fund to support C.I.D. programs into the future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -90.1%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.13; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.