Friends of the Carlisle Council on Aging Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043242473
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Carlisle, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9783697414
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,286
- Expenses
- $40,109
- Assets
- $213,151
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEAN BAGNASCHI (PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH ACQUAVIVA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PEG GLADSTONE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEAN BAGNASCHI (PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH ACQUAVIVA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PEG GLADSTONE (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The friends of the carlisle council on aging was established in 1994 as a non-profit volunteer organization in the commonwealth of ma. The founding members recognized the need to supplement town funds and state grants to advance efforts that could help make growing older in carlisle a viable and appealing option. The friends' mission is to promote the physical and emotional well-being of our older citizens by providing financial support for the coa's special programs, activities, and needs.
What it reported doing in 2024
The main focus of the fundraising efforts of the friends of the carlisle council on aging is to donate in order to support the services provided by the the council on aging (foccoa, the friends) and human services (coahs). Coahs of carlisle, ma has provided numerous services to the aging population of carlisle, not limited to - reduced rides for medical and other appointments, home visits, events, meals programs, and for 2024 - reduced property tax expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.3%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.31; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -86.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.