Friends of the Brooklyn New School Bklyn School for Collaborative Studies
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300085525
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2122914877
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $213,505
- Expenses
- $154,028
- Assets
- $368,576
- Liabilities
- $21,118
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michaela Daniel (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Melissa Wu (CO-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Michaela Daniel (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Melissa Wu (CO-PRESIDENT)
- Hannah Lane (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Friends of bns/bcs is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to the support of two nyc public schools: brooklyn new school -bns (grades pre-k through 5); brooklyn school for collaborative studies -bcs (grades 6 through 8) and their opt(organization of parents and teachers)
What it reported doing in 2024
Friends of the brooklyn new school/brooklyn school for collaborative studies (friends) is a nonprofit organization that raises funds to help these alternative sister schools maintain and expand current programming for art, music, applied learning in the humanities, environmental studies, and other innovative after-school programs. In addition, friends provides funds for the improvement of the school building itself to make it a more effective learning space. New York city department of education funding is inadequate to meet the needs of the 900+ students served by the two schools. Both schools are economically and ethnically diverse and have a strong ongoing commitment to diversity.programs and activities funded via friends include: teaching artists: through funds obtained by friends, a teaching artist was retained to provide music and movement instruction to elementary school students through the brooklyn arts exchange (bax). Every bns class k-5 meets with a bax teaching artist for 14-28 weeks at different starting and ending points over the course of a full year. They work with one of two bax teaching artists donna costello and jose garcia. Classes meet 1x per week with the exception of the 4th grade that meets for double sessions or 2x per week when preparing for the 4th grade musical, the equivalent of 8 extra sessionsenvironmental trips: the third, fourth and fifth grade students participate in overnight camping trips at y camps. These camps include frost valley ymca, the ashokan center, inc and camp speers -eljabar ymca. These camps have an environmental focus, and provide hands-on enrichment to the science curriculum. In addition, for many students, this trip is a first experience in a non-urban outdoor setting. Monies raised ensure all students can participate in these trips, regardless of individual families' ability to pay.arts enrichment: funds received were used to support arts programming at kentler galleries for elementary students. Begun in 2004, the k.i.d.s. Art education program brings classes to kentler international drawing space for a 90-minute art appreciation and hands-on art making experience relating to kentler's current exhibition. Two art educators lead the class visits that help develop the students ability to express themselves through art and encourage critical and independent thinking about visual culture. The gallery visit along with the in-school post-visit per class serves to bridge the gallery experience with the classroom.other curricular expenses: funds various educational initiatives including: expenditures related to science trips and curriculum; 23 weeks of k-5 spanish enrichment classes; a 40 week sustainability program designed to impart sustainable living through student participation in: grading, recycling, composting, healthy cooking and eating, exploring nature, designing for a sustainable future, and community activism, the school library, a fourth grade sailing trip on the hudson river sloop clearwater; and the elementary school added value farm study comprised of trips to the red hook community farm where the curriculum includes: life cycles, sequencing, community interdependence, living creatures, and where our food comes from.parental, school administration & community communication: friends supports the provision of materials, printing, and distribution costs of various printed materials such as back-pack mail, posters, notices, etc that faciliate communication within the school, and help establish a common framework for dialogue between families, teachers and the administration. Expenses include copy paper, copy machine repair, ink jet cartidges, pens, pencils, supplemental school related and other schools supplies. Also funds food and other expenses related to parents as learning partners workshop and graduation ceremonies.professional development/teacher stipends: directly funds the purchase of classroom supplies, educational materials, and field trip expenses or funds tea
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $63.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.39; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.