Friends of the British Council USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271976339
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 5713190421
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $472,376
- Expenses
- $333,387
- Assets
- $285,370
- Liabilities
- $10,363
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIN SULLIVAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ERIN SULLIVAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $163,472 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of friends of the british council, USA (fobc) is to create mutual understanding and trust between people of the uk and around the world. Fobc works primarily by enabling us participation in strategic partnerships with the british council's work globally.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education, professional development & research: we enabled israeli scientists of outstanding ability to pursue their postdoctoral research at the university of cambridge while fostering a scholarly exchange and greater understanding between researchers in britain and israel through our blavatnik fellows program. Fellows worked with multiple different departments of cambridge to further their research of a variety of subjects.we continued supporting the professional development program for social science researchers through menasp - middle east and north africa social policy network through a partnership with the university of birmingham. This project creates new research pathways and supports existing ones to improve the quality of social science research in the region while also connecting social science researchers to policymakers and practitioners to share best practice, strengthen problem solving approaches to social policy, and to learn from one another through international policy workshops, the consolidation of academic networks, and the enhancement of an online platform for social policy researchers and practitioners.we produced research, hosted and conducted workshops, held strategic planning sessions, and provided both mentoring and training for program managers and business development colleagues globally on development and delivery of partnerships with foundations, corporations, multi-lateral agencies, public and educational institutions, and high net worth individuals. We developed pitches, concept notes, and grant proposals for us and international foundations for programs in teacher professional development, foundational learning, womens economic empowerment, peacebuilding, youth employability, film, online learning, creative economy, and cultural heritage.we continued partnering with the micro: bit education foundation to create educational resources that inspire young people to get excited about technology and stem. This project supports elementary teachers in title 1 schools in the united states to teach digital skills through new curriculum, eight unique projects using micro: bit computing devices, and production of "how to" videos all meeting csta standards.we continued supported the british pavilion exhibit at the venice biannale and supported the professional development of young art and exhibition curators through the british council's young curators program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.1%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 62.5%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 82.1%; rating input score 82; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 49%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.1% of revenue deployed · 62.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $208K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 8 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.