Friends of the Animal Shelter of St Joseph Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522438213
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Saint Joseph, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8162714877
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $631,580
- Expenses
- $248,737
- Assets
- $2,389,958
- Liabilities
- $89,809
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ED VANOVER (PRESIDENT)
- KIMBER SLAGLE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANGIE LEATHERMAN (DIRECTOR)
- AMBER HALSTEAD (DIRECTOR)
- KIM BARRON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support the animal shelter staff to: increase animal adoption and redemption rates to minimize euthanized animals; educate community on animal care and welfare issues; help care for medical needs of all sick and injured animals that come through the animal shelter.
What it reported doing in 2024
Friends of the animal shelter of st. Joseph, inc. (fotas) continues its mission to support the st. Joseph animal shelter by funding medical care for animals in need and by assisting in increasing adoption rates for those animals determined to be adoptable. Our collective goal remains to help the shelter maintain a no kill status, defined as a 90% or higher live release rate. In this effort, fotas contributed $89,516 in grants to the shelter for adoption specials to reduce the cost to potential adopters. This helped save 701 animals in 2024. Through continued collaboration between fotas and the st. Joseph animal shelter, notable progress was seen in lifesaving outcomes, particularly for dogs. In 2024, the shelter achieved a 96% live release rate for dogsan improvement from 90% in 2023. This increase is attributed in part to efforts that reduced owner relinquishments by providing alternatives and resources for rehoming. Cat outcomes, however, continue to be challenged by rising intake numbers. The live release rate for cats was 88% in 2023 and 87% in 2024. Despite only a slight decrease, the shelter faced a 59% increase in cat intake and a 70% increase in kitten intake in 2024, resulting in a 66% overall increase in feline intake. Obviously medical care has to be supplied to all the animals that enter the shelter regardless of adoptability. In 2024 fotas continued their support of this necessary service by providing $72,931 of reduced cost veterinary care, other than spay/neuter services. We continue to educate the public through signage, social media posts, weekly tv pet previews, and our own pet previews regarding the need to spay and neuter your pets. We are in our second year of growing our spay it forward program offering free spay and neuter services to individuals who cannot afford spay/neuter costs for their pets. In 2024 we provided $5,406 of grants in the form of spay/neuter veterinarian services for 81 pets under this program. Finally, in february, 2024, we sold the building we had originally acquired for the renovation of a new st joseph shelter. We would use these proceeds, along with our capital campaign funds, to donate to a new shelter being built by the city of st joseph starting in 2025. Further explanation is contained in schedule n, part iii regarding the history behind this event and its current status. We continue to be fully committed to our mission and the goals thereinwe will always be there for the shelter and saving the animals that enter its door.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.4%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 5.7%; rating input score 6; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.61; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.4% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $207K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 25 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 6/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.