Friends of the Albion Public Library
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382829704
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Albion, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5176294864
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,030
- Expenses
- $1,288
- Assets
- $37,184
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYD DULANEY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GLORIA FISHER (BOARD MEMBER)
- STEVE SOBASKI (SECRETARY)
- TAMARA CRUPI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To increase the awareness and to promote the use, among the public, of the albion district library; to aid in increasing financial support of the albion district library from public and private sources; to coordinate efforts of all groups and individuals for the benefit of the albion district library; to sponsor and stimulate volunteer service for the library; to sponsor and/or promote library programs and services for the community; and to do all other acts and exercise all other powers conferred on nonprofit corporations as necessary in the fulfillment of its purposes.
What it reported doing in 2025
Raise awareness of and support for the library.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.1%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 28.87; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.