Friends of Startup Moxie Elkhart County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
612107672
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Elkhart, IN, USA
Phone
5746068942
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$181,508
Expenses
$90,315
Assets
$158,178
Liabilities
$2,877

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ashley Molyneaux (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kristine Weimer (Executive Dir.)
  • Rob Meyers (Chairman)
  • Ashley Molyneaux (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations sole purpose is to conduct fundraising activities and make disbursements exclusively in support of Startup Moxie Elkhart County, an educational entrepreneurship program of the Greater Elkhart Chamber of Commerce.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided funding for the program and operational expenses of Startup Moxie Elkhart Countys educational entrepreneurship program, a flagship year-long accredited entrepreneurship program serving high school juniors and seniors throughout the South BendElkhart region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 62.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 197.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 198.5% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 199.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $94K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.