Friends of St Joseph-kaupo
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461933380
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kahului, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8084953914
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $450
- Expenses
- $1,297
- Assets
- $35,587
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- BENNY MAILE PERRY (CHAIRPERSON/)
- MARVY GIBBS (COMMUNICATIO)
- ROBERT BOB MURAKAMI (MAINTENANCE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized exclusively to receive contributions which shall be applied toward charitable purposes, including the repair, renovations, maintenance, and preservation of historically significant, as well as culturally significant, buildings, including existing religious and cultural sites and structures, located within the rural hawaiian community of kaupo, maui, Hawaii.
What it reported doing in 2024
A steering committee has been formed to achieve the corporation's goal of restoring st joseph church at kaupo. The church building is in dire need of repairs: termite damage, roof needs to be replaced, walls may need structural bracing, etc
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 19
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -188.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 27.44; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 79.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -41% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 18.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $243 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.