Friends of SOCSA Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474799181
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Dana Point, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9495810651
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,854
- Expenses
- $101,988
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Olympia Patrick (Co-President)
- Lisa Fry (Co-President)
People named in this filing
- Olympia Patrick (Co-President)
- Lisa Fry (Co-President)
- Kathryn Takach (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To raise financial support for Dana Hills High School arts program.
What it reported doing in 2017
This organization provides financial support for SOCSAs programs, materials, and activities. This shall be done by soliciting corporate donations, small business sponsorships, and parent and community support, as well as by organizing fundraisers and seeking grants.This organization shall also provide support to SOCSA programs as follows: Communication among parents, faculty, students, and the communityClerical and other program support to SOCSA teachersRefreshments and other performance and exhibit support
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -98% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.