Friends of Pc West Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900662025
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Phone
4053145380
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$1,904
Assets
$21,200
Liabilities
$450

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DICK CLICK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DICK CLICK (PRESIDENT)
  • H RIC HEDGES (VICE PRESIDE)
  • RON HISE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation was founded by alumni (and the planned activity is) to raise funds to benefit putnam city west high school, its students, its surrounding communities and other organizations as deemed necessary. The funds will be donated or used to purchase assets for various departments at the high school based on the departments needs and priorities. The activity will be conducted by the foundation board and any volunteers. The activity will be continuous. The activity will be conducted wherever funds can be raised. The activity will further our exempt purpose by allowing the foundation to assist and improve the high school. The activity will be funded through donations.

What it reported doing in 2025

The foundation: 1) donated funds to various departments at the high school based on the department's needs and priorities. 2) purchased assets for various departments at the high school based on the department's needs and priorities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.13; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.