Friends of Nambale Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825331665
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Norwalk, CT, USA
- Phone
- 9177339255
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,616
- Expenses
- $519
- Assets
- $67,778
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREN CALBY (PRESIDENT/TR)
People named in this filing
- KAREN CALBY (PRESIDENT/TR)
- CHRISTOPHER CALBY (TRUSTEE)
- ELIZABETH CALBY (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the long-term development and sustainablity of the community of nambale, kenya in a variety of ways, focusing on but not limited to 1) educational advancement primarily through operational support of the nambale magnet school and scholarship assistance for its students; 2)community economic development efforts, such as vocational, agricultural, and technology training and microfinance support of local entrepreneurial business initiatives and 3)community services, including the development of buildings and programming targeted at encouraging local residents and enhancing community life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational advancement primarily through operational support of the nambale magnet school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 97.8%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 130.59; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -42.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -32.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.