Friends of Naivasha Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
030564411
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Phone
4023052524
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,503
Expenses
$9,899
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CINDY BERKLAND (PRESIDENT)
  • BENJAMIN HOY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • CINDY BERKLAND (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTOPHER CHEUVRONT (DIRECTOR)
  • C K DURYEA (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Improve health care in naivasha, keyna by assisting in the building and operating of a 56-bed women's health care facility containing gynecological, obstetrical and neonatal units. The hospital provides care for approximately 300,000 kenyans within a 50-mile area around naivasha. Due to overcrowded conditions, patients often had to share beds. The maternity unit delivers an average of 15 babies a day.

What it reported doing in 2018

Grant to rotary international to support america academy of pediatrics for helping babies breathe to teach nurses resuscitation techniques in the first golden minute of life. Program involved a teaching exchange program to improve outcomes of babies with asphyxia by teaching "helping babies breathe" international certification and also teaching nurses to utilize cpap to treat asphyxia in newborns. Six professionals from omaha traveled to nakuru, kenya in march and six professionals traveled from kenya to omaha to train for this project. The education is in progress at the hospital and the project will continue for another year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.1%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 39%; rating input score 39

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -79.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -35.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.1% of revenue deployed · 39% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.