Friends of Naffo C/o Apf Properties Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452519842
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2125863900
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- International Peace and Security
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,000
- Expenses
- $52,062
- Assets
- $120,839
- Liabilities
- $1,600
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- BERNDT PERL (DIRECTOR)
- MARY GUT (DIRECTOR)
- ANN ROSENBLATT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to enhance objective, accurate and unbiased understanding of the status of democracy and preservation of human rights in all countries in the middle east, including, but not limited to the political, economic, geographic, social, religious and historical causes of the arab-israeli conflict, in the belief that this type of understanding is essential to resolving this conflict and creating the conditions for stable and edduring peace,
What it reported doing in 2025
Raise funds to enhance objective, accurate and biased understanding of the status of democracy and preservation of human rights in all countries in the middle east, including, but not limited to the political, economic, geographic, social, religious and historical causes of the arab-israeli conflict, in the beflief of understanding is essential to resolving this conflict and creating the conditions for stable and enduring peace.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.3%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.32; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.