Friends of Nafda- the Alternative Approach to Effective Education

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923072408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2027254174
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,528
Expenses
$132,235
Assets
$28,120
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Nadim Matta (Chair)
  • Ronnie Hammad (Treasurer)
  • Nadim Kyriakos-Saad (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

> The purposes for which this corporation is organized are exclusively educational, scientific, and charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, as amended. In furtherance of these purposes, the corporation shall support the NAFDA Association for an Alternative Approach to Effective Education in the Republic of Lebanon and may carry on any other lawful activities consistent with tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, as determined by the Board of Directors.

What it reported doing in 2025

Nafda worked with 130 schools across Lebanon in different capacities, directly engaging 808 educators and 22,850 students. 2025 reflects a year of significant scale and adaptability, where nafda not only expanded its reach and deepened its impact, but also responded to emerging needsensuring that schools continued to serve as spaces for learning, well-being, and active citizenship. 1. Capacity Building (Principals & Educators) Continued delivering structured training, coaching, and peer learning to strengthen school leadership, governance, and transformation practices Supported schools in applying nafdas model across key areas: learning, values integration, and community engagement Across a core group of schools: 85% showed overall improvement in school transformation 89% advanced in student-centered learning approaches 92% strengthened values-based education practices Result: stronger leadership, improved school culture, and increased ability to sustain change 2. Citizenship & Youth Civic Engagement (Aal Seha) Expanded implementation of nafdas citizenship tool (Aal Seha) to 90 schools and 3 scout groups, reaching 7,519 students and training 103 facilitators Enhanced delivery through improved tool design and a junior version for younger students Enabled students to apply learning through: Mock elections and student-led governance initiatives Environmental and community-based campaigns Engagement with local stakeholders Result: students demonstrated increased agency, participation, and civic responsibility 3. School Transformation Projects Supported 42 school-led transformation projects connecting education to real-world needs, including: Well-being and psychosocial support initiatives Agripreneurship and innovation projects STEAM and innovation-focused learning across multiple schools Projects emphasized student ownership, teacher capacity, and community involvement Result: schools translated learning into practical, community-connected change 4. Emergency Response & Adaptation Beyond its core programmatic work, nafda operated in a context of escalating conflict and displacement in Lebanon during this period. In response, the organization adapted its approach to meet urgent needs within its school network. Key emergency response activities included: Providing psychosocial support activities to 628 students Training 22 principals and teachers to sustain well-being practices within schools Delivering emergency-responsive teaching webinars to 425 educators Facilitating trust-building and social cohesion activities: 900 participants engaged during the war across five locations 12,500 students and 190 teachers reached post-war through classroom-based activities These efforts aimed to ensure that schools remained safe, supportive environments, while maintaining continuity of learning and reinforcing social cohesion during a period of crisis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.5%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 100.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.5% of revenue deployed · 2.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.