Friends of Montessori Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 480686224
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Prairie Village, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9136496160
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,655,904
- Expenses
- $1,849,468
- Assets
- $3,861,844
- Liabilities
- $264,775
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBBIE GREENBERG (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHY MORRISON (DIRECTOR): $121,414 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of highlawn montessori school is to provide a child-centered montessori community which facilitates the social, emotional, physical and cognitive development of each child.
What it reported doing in 2024
Montessori school with 184 students: traditional program hours: 8:40 - 11:40 am (ages 3 to 4) extended day hours: 8:40 am - 2:30 pm (ages 4 to 6).new students enrolled in the tradition children's house program, starting as young as age 3, attend our school from 8:40 - 11:40 am monday through friday. As children show academic and social readiness to work independently, usually between ages 4 and 5, the directress will invite them to stay for extended day until 2:30. These children stay for lunch beginning one afternoon a week. The children's workday then extends from morning into the afternoon with opportunity for more in-depth exploration.the children's house extended day program is offered to children 4 and older. This session runs from 8:40 - 2:30 pm. Monday through friday. The afternoon extended day allows the older children to have more academic, smaller group experience in their classroom. Children are invited to start one afternoon and slowly increase the number of afternoons. The decision concerning the child's readiness for extended day is made by the classroom teacher with input from the parents. Readiness for extended day is determined by observing the child. Guidelines the teacher will use include the following. The child: has a desire to stay for lunch and the extended day. Has given up taking naps or no longer naps everyday. Can work independently for extended periods of time. Can focus during the more difficult and complicated lessons. Full day children's house program hours: 7:30 am - 5:30 pm 3, 4, or 5 days per week. The full day children's house program, starting with children as young as age 3, includes extended hours from as early as 7:30 am to 5:30 pm. Parents have the option to enroll their child on a fee-based schedule for 3, 4, or 5 full days per week, with varying dismissal times until 5:30 pm. The full day program is an extension of the tradition children's house class. Children enjoy a relaxed, cozy, home-like atmosphere under the direction of a trained montessori teacher. This program offers the best of both worlds; the nurturing and comfort of home and the challenging stimulation of montessori. Children participate joyfully in many activities; care for the environment, science, cultural activities, art, music, movement, cooking and games. The children may choose to participate in an organized activity or work freely in a fully equipped montessori classroom to enhance the child's social, emotional, spiritual and cognitive growth.children's house montessori classroom children ages 3 to 6 directly learn through their senses and absorb information effortlessly through movement and hands-on materials. The focus of montessori education is not academic readiness or the mastery of a specific skill, but development of the whole child socially, emotionally, physically, and intellectually. The mixed age classes offer opportunities to learn which do not exist in same-age settings. The olderm experienced children become leaders and role models to the younger children, who absorb social values and cultural impressions from the activities of the older children. The children learn details of math, language and geography just from walking through the classroom! Through leadership, the older children gain self-confidence and responsibility. A natural, family-like atmosphere develops spontaneously, resulting in a bond between the children and also with the guide. From this comes the greatest level of social development mutual care and respect.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.09; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.