Friends of Kapsowar
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 392480167
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,185
- Expenses
- $20,636
- Assets
- $110,549
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Regan Strutner (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Regan Strutner (Executive Director)
- Gerhard Schumacher (Chairman)
- Jon Roelofs (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Friends of Kapsowar provides financial and in-kind support to Kapsowar Mission Hospital in Kenya a rural hospital serving over 40,000 patients annually. In 2025 the organization funded patient care medical supplies and hospital infrastructure including the purchase of essential equipment and support for vulnerable patients unable to pay for care. Funds were used to strengthen maternal and child health services improve access to treatment and ensure continuity of care in a resource-limited setting.
What it reported doing in 2025
Friends of Kapsowar supported the purchase and delivery of essential medical supplies and equipment for Kapsowar Mission Hospital in Kenya. In 2025 this included patient monitoring equipment oxygen concentrators and suction machines. These resources strengthened the hospitals ability to provide safe effective care in a resource-limited setting and improved outcomes for patients across multiple departments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.3%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 84.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.36; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.3% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.