Friends of Jackson County Animal Shelter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883336800
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Gainesboro, TN, USA
Phone
9319522079
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,980
Expenses
$48,539
Assets
$146,191
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark Pack (President/Director)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Pack (President/Director)
  • Joseph Klein (Chairman/Director)
  • Diana Mandli (Treasurer/Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Animal welfare in Jackson County, TN, including spay/neuter for dogs and cats; fostering and adoption for homeless dogs and cats; food, supplies and medical care for dogs and cats to assist economically-disadvantaged pet owners; and budgeting/planning to construct a physical shelter for homeless animals.

What it reported doing in 2024

Planning/Budgeting for Physical Animal Shelter: FJCAS is fundraising, planning and budgeting to construction a physical animal shelter to serve homeless dogs and cats in Jackson County, TN. This fiscal year, 28.08ac of vacant land was donated to FJCAS for the purposes of building the shelter. The value of this donation is included in Part I, Line 1, and also reflected in Part II, Balance Sheets, Line 23, with supplemental information provided in Schedule O.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.2%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 110.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 121.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.2% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.