Friends of Humane Services in Tijuana
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770704404
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- San Ysidro, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6199223394
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $140,595
- Expenses
- $108,264
- Assets
- $358,017
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Richard Massa (President)
People named in this filing
- Richard Massa (President)
- Vicky Godoy (Director)
- Alejandro Arias Zavala (Sec'y/Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Friends of Humane Services in Tijuana was founded in August of 2007. Our mission is to support organizations and individuals who work to improve the conditions in the US and Mexican communities that border the Tijuana, Mexico area, by promoting programs of humane treatment of animals; in particular, spay and neutering programs, parasite control programs, street rescues, prevention of international smuggling of animals through awareness and public education, and general public education to inculcate a culture of humane treatment of animals.
What it reported doing in 2024
For the fiscal year ending on 30 June 2025, FHSTJ was able to exceed its goals due to the generosity of our donors. We provided 1,114 free spay/neuter surgeries for rescuers and people with limited resources. 1,650 low cost spay/neuter for those able to contribute to the cost of materials.402 free veterinary medical/surgical treatments for animals of rescuers, placed 54 dogs in forever homes in the San Diego area, and facilitated 80 cat and dog adoptions in Mexico. We distributed 25,000 pounds of pet food. The vast majority of FHSTJ support is via event-based funding to cover the expenses of grassroots rescue groups that staff mass free spay/ neuter clinics in the poorest areas of Tijuana. FHSTJ also provides medications and materials to volunteers doing free mange and parasite treatment at street events for pets as well as street animals located in the most distressed areas of the greater Tijuana area. Individual veterinary treatments were provided to animals of rescuers via a certificate program that facilitates immediate veterinary care. The aforementioned programs also provide public education through both formal public sessions and informal one-on-one counseling.With the continued and loyal support of donors, especially our sustaining donors, we were able to help a record number of animals by providing financial support to 5 volunteer Mexican rescue groups that desperately need financial assistance to grow and thrive. These groups work in the poorest communities of the greater Tijuana area. They staff mass spay/neuter clinics, street clinics and do rescues. FHSTJs mission is to help them as well as individuals doing street rescues. We are unlike many organizations who do work in Mexico. Rather than run a shelter that can only accommodate a limited number of animals or take on a project and return to the USA when finished, we have a presence in Mexico 24/7 and are helping Mexican rescuers daily. This is cost effective and efficient. It makes the best use of donations. It also provides a better environment for rescued animals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 69.8%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 69.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.