Friends of Hopital Albert Schweitzer Haiti
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251841564
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123614884
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $155,284
- Expenses
- $174,845
- Assets
- $61,981
- Liabilities
- $1,442
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LUCY RAWSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- EDWARD RAWSON (EXECUTIVE DI)
- LUCY RAWSON (PRESIDENT)
- DAVE BRAUER (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Haiti friends, through art, expands awareness of the culture of the haitian people and their economic and ecological needs while improving the environmental conditions in haiti.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization focuses on education. In haiti, working with the farmers in the desolate mountain communities, htrip (haiti timber re- introduction program) technicians introduce farming techniques, which restore the soil and retain the water that is needed for food production for their families. Htrip serves as a prototype for ecological restoration elsewhere in haiti, through its unique approach to community ownership, collaborative work, and group decision-making. Htrip could be used as a national model.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.7% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $121K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.