Friends of Hihiri Pipiri

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883282557
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Hillsboro, OR, USA
Phone
5035217978
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,193
Expenses
$27,658
Assets
$10,967
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sophie Ray Lee (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sophie Ray Lee (President)
  • Lavrenty Repin (International Liaison)
  • William D Wickart (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To recover, nurture and vindicate the Artist as translator and mediator by ensuring their Freedom of Movement; Restoring, building, reimagining infrastructure and educational tools for Creative Sanctuaries, their Communities and Guests; Promoting and coordinating exploratory Performance, Craft and Research of a shared transcultural ethic.

What it reported doing in 2025

From what I read in the IRS 990-EZ requirements, this is not required for an organization with less than $50,000 income and expenditures. However, this past year, we have constructed and helped to fund a community health center for the Yanomame people (Amazonian jungle); sponsored and executed a backwards walk across Scandinavia to raise funds for work in the Congo and Mid-East; sent a family of four from Italy to Sri Lanka to teach at a grade school in Elabadagama, as well as adding to the structure and performing maintenance; Funded a 10,000 INR artist's project each month; sponsored two artists to local performance festivals; maintained a small outreach center and mobile art museum in Santeniketan, West Bengal, india (donor-specified donations we passed through to the final recipients); Produced a mural as part of the biennale art festival in Kolkata; Sent our liaison to our partner site in northern Italy to help upgrade their printing shop and work in the crop field; held two in-person planning "convergences" to focus our directions of outreach and prioritize individual projects. The amount here is simply our operating totals for these good works.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 15
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 15.6%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 14

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 15.6% of revenue deployed · 13.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.