Friends of Hana Keiki

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273103451
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Hana, HI, USA
Phone
8082488323
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,143
Expenses
$3,600
Assets
$2,543

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Friends of Hana Keiki will provide support to the children of the greater Hana community by developing, promoting and funding programs which enhance the: -Children's academic achievement -Children's social and emotional development -Children's cultural enrichment -Children's healthful recreation and physical fitness -Facilities serving Hana's children

What it reported doing in 2010

Hana Athletics This sub-committee is similar to an athletic booster club. The primary activity of this sub-committee is to supplement the cost of students' participation in school athletics. We will provide teams travel shirts and meal supplement for overnight and state tournament travel. We will provide and supplement travel to pre- and post-season tournaments. We will provide miscellaneous athletic supplies to athletes who cannot afford needed personal equipment. We will support the continuing education of coaches and athletic department staff at Hana High School. We will also support the improvement of the recreational facilities at Hana High and Elementary School. Travel to tournaments was supplemented and other supplies were purchased for athletes who did not have the financial means to purchase them during the 2010-2011 school year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.2%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.2% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.