Friends of Hamilton County Parks Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205360193
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Carmel, IN, USA
Phone
3179667911
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parks and Playgrounds

Reported finances

Revenue
$492,528
Expenses
$281,275
Assets
$1,966,392
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Thomas McLean (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • April Williams (Executive Dir.): $80,000 total reported compensation
  • Jessica Paschen (Development and Operations Assistan): $8,216 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Friends of Hamilton County Parks is to encourage, promote, benefit and maintain public parks and green spaces in Hamilton County, Indiana.

What it reported doing in 2024

At the Friends of Hamilton County Parks (FHCP), our mission is clear: to ensure our community has assess to parks aand amenities that meet the needs and expectations of eveyone. As we reflect on 2023, we are proud of the significant strides we've made to enrich our local parks and foster a vibrant community spirit.This tear, we provide essential funding to the Hamilton County Parks and Recreation Department, enabling vital projects that enhance our park system. From the restoration of the historical Williams House at Coxhill to the revitalization of the centerpiece fountain, our efforts are making a lasting impact. We also proudly supported comcerts at Cool Creek Park, bringing joy and connection to our community through shared experiences.The support we've receive from donors continues to grow, showcasing a shared commitment to our parks. Our annual golf outing has evolved into an unique fundraising opportunity, attracting new sponsors and fostering relationships with local corporations eager to invest in our community's future.The FHCP Board has expanded, reflecting the diversity and representation of greater Hamilton County. This strong foundation allows us to pursue our strategic plan, which includes four key goals aimed at enhancing our parks and promoting healthy, active living.Looking ahead to 2025, we are excited to launch initiatives aligned with the CDC's Active People, Healthy Nation campaign. We're also building relationships with the eight municipalities in Hamilton County to identify projects that will further support active living in our community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.99; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $215K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.