Friends of Bukwo Global
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 372021090
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 3073693024
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $147,711
- Expenses
- $162,392
- Assets
- $27,432
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACEY THOMPSON (BOARD PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JUDI OGLE (BOARD SECRETARY)
- SUE SCHENCK (DIRECTOR)
- JAMES HAYES (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote sustainable healthcare, education, and economic development services to support and develop a vibrant community thus ensuring a prosperous future for the people of bukwo consistent with strong christian beliefs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Love4bukwo medical center functions as a full-service hospital with outpatient services and clinic. Education takes place as patients use their services and the hospital hosts a bible study for area pastors so they can then teach the people in their churches. Love4bukwo opened a restaurant in december 2023 which employees more local people and promotes economic development as it purchases as many products as possible from the local area. This restaurant also brings more people into the community as it can host groups. It also helps to sustain the hospital as all proceeds are poured back into the facility to assist in costs not covered by patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.4%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.4% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $141K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.