Friends of Belle Isle Marsh Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222544075
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
East Boston, MA, USA
Phone
7818542301
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$169,136
Expenses
$91,461
Assets
$98,136

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Justi Santana (Board Vice President)
  • Kannan Thiruvengadam (Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Justi Santana (Board Vice President)
  • Kannan Thiruvengadam (Board President)
  • Erica Foley (Board Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect the marsh from toxic industrial use and development, to allow the marsh to thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

Friends of Belle Isle Marsh works to educate the surrounding communities on the importance of marsh flood control, biodiversity, and passive recreation by hosting events at the marsh, organizing community engagement meetings, creation of education materials, and maintenance of website and staffing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.1%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 38.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 131% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $105K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.