Friends and Foundation of the Corvallis- Benton County Public Library

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930933948
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Corvallis, OR, USA
Phone
5417666928
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,221,658
Expenses
$116,668
Assets
$4,723,505
Liabilities
$36

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOLLY CHAO (President)
  • ROBERT HULSHOF-SCHMIDT (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DOLLY CHAO (President)
  • ROBERT HULSHOF-SCHMIDT (Vice President)
  • JACQUE SCHRECK (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our name has changed to the friends and foundation of the corvallis-benton county public library and our mission statement has also changed. It is: to enrich the lives of the people in benton county by fostering a vibrant, accessible and inclusive corvallis-benton county public library system through advocacy, volunteerism and philanthropic support. We envision a thriving and inclusive community where the corvallis-benton county public library is a cornerstone of lifelong learning, inspiration and connection for residents.

What it reported doing in 2024

The friends & foundation provides funding to make it possible for the main library and all branch libraries to better meet the needs of library patrons. Funding activities conducted in 2024-25 included the following.- transferred 27,730 in donor designated funds collected in prior fiscal years to the corvallis-benton county public library for purchase of materials for the collection, including large print materials.- transferred $416 in donor designated funds collected in prior fiscal year to the corvallis-benton county public library for the read dog program and paid $16,189 to vendors at the library's request in support of library programming. These expenditures included payments to program presenters, a project to improve signage for wayfinding in buldings, equipment maintenance, and the purchase of small equipment and supplies in support of library progamming.- transferred $13,500 in donor designated funds collected in prior fiscal years to alsea community effort for support of operations at the alsea community library.- paid vendors at the request of the benton-county public libarary for staff attendance at the Oregon library association conference, the american library association conferences, and training sessions for the koha integrated library system.- paid vendors at the request of the south benton county enhancement association to support the monroe community library.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 36
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 95
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 13.5%; rating input score 13
  • Program expense ratio: 60.6%; rating input score 61
  • Fundraising efficiency: $36.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 90.5%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 40.49; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 13.5% of revenue deployed · 60.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.