Frick Art & Historical Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251596285
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4123710600
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,603,076
Expenses
$8,975,230
Assets
$121,400,654
Liabilities
$586,495

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

41 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMANDA DUNYAK-GILLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENTERED 05/25))

Highest reported compensation

  • AMANDA DUNYAK-GILLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENTERED 05/25)): $227,067 total reported compensation
  • LISA GEHRING (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $174,259 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT HENNINGER (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $150,057 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2025

Visitor experience & education: the frick pittsburgh delivers meaningful cultural experiences for educators, students, families, tourists, and community members through dynamic programs and interpretive offerings across its magnificent garden campus. (continuted on schedule o)- clayton interpretation & house tours - the refreshed clayton tour situates the frick family story within the broader context of pittsburgh's industrial history. Centered in 1892, it addresses the homestead strike, the assassination attempt on henry clay frick, and the legacy of the gilded age. The tour received an institutional achievement award from pa museums and an award of excellence from the american association for state and local history. In fy26, the frick also launched public tours of the never-before-seen third and fourth floors and preservation tours highlighting the clayton exterior project. - family & community programs - the frick engages families year-round through drop-in activities, creative workshops, and seasonal festivals. Nearly 7,000 visitors attended three free summer fridays concerts (a fourth was cancelled due to weather), enjoying live music, artmaking, picnics, and food trucks. An additional 2,700 visitors participated in frick winterfest, a two-day january celebration featuring a clayton open house, artmaking, live music, and family activities. Summer camps and family programs further support creative learning through art, movement, and play. - commitment to access - admission to the frick's campus and permanent collections is free. Discounted admission and membership rates are offered to teachers, students, seniors, youth 17 and under, people with disabilities, first responders, veterans, active military, and reserves. The frick provides $2 ebt admission through museums for all, ensuring broad community access. - learning experiences for all ages - visitors participate in intergenerational programs including museum tours, gallery conversations, lectures, panel discussions, concerts, community field trips, and hands-on artmaking experiences. - school & teacher engagement - the frick's intimate scale and personalized service support customized field trips developed collaboratively with educators, ensuring meaningful, curriculum aligned learning experiences. - community partnerships - the frick's education team partners with schools, afterschool programs and community organizations to develop curricula, provide artmaking supplies, and connect hands-on learning to museum visits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.53; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 41 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.