Frick Art & Historical Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251596285
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123710600
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,603,076
- Expenses
- $8,975,230
- Assets
- $121,400,654
- Liabilities
- $586,495
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMANDA DUNYAK-GILLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENTERED 05/25))
Highest reported compensation
- AMANDA DUNYAK-GILLEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENTERED 05/25)): $227,067 total reported compensation
- LISA GEHRING (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $174,259 total reported compensation
- ROBERT HENNINGER (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $150,057 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2025
Visitor experience & education: the frick pittsburgh delivers meaningful cultural experiences for educators, students, families, tourists, and community members through dynamic programs and interpretive offerings across its magnificent garden campus. (continuted on schedule o)- clayton interpretation & house tours - the refreshed clayton tour situates the frick family story within the broader context of pittsburgh's industrial history. Centered in 1892, it addresses the homestead strike, the assassination attempt on henry clay frick, and the legacy of the gilded age. The tour received an institutional achievement award from pa museums and an award of excellence from the american association for state and local history. In fy26, the frick also launched public tours of the never-before-seen third and fourth floors and preservation tours highlighting the clayton exterior project. - family & community programs - the frick engages families year-round through drop-in activities, creative workshops, and seasonal festivals. Nearly 7,000 visitors attended three free summer fridays concerts (a fourth was cancelled due to weather), enjoying live music, artmaking, picnics, and food trucks. An additional 2,700 visitors participated in frick winterfest, a two-day january celebration featuring a clayton open house, artmaking, live music, and family activities. Summer camps and family programs further support creative learning through art, movement, and play. - commitment to access - admission to the frick's campus and permanent collections is free. Discounted admission and membership rates are offered to teachers, students, seniors, youth 17 and under, people with disabilities, first responders, veterans, active military, and reserves. The frick provides $2 ebt admission through museums for all, ensuring broad community access. - learning experiences for all ages - visitors participate in intergenerational programs including museum tours, gallery conversations, lectures, panel discussions, concerts, community field trips, and hands-on artmaking experiences. - school & teacher engagement - the frick's intimate scale and personalized service support customized field trips developed collaboratively with educators, ensuring meaningful, curriculum aligned learning experiences. - community partnerships - the frick's education team partners with schools, afterschool programs and community organizations to develop curricula, provide artmaking supplies, and connect hands-on learning to museum visits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 70.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.53; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 41 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.