Fresno-greater San Joaquin Valley Junior Golf Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770311270
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5592215071
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$6,219
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CONRAD NILMEIER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PAUL T CHAMBERS (ATTORNEY)
  • GREG VAUGHN (DIRECTOR)
  • MIKE SCHY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To foster youth involvement in amateur golf participation and competition. The desire of our foundation for all juniors with whom we come in contact is to instill in their minds and hearts that all people are created equal; that all are given mutual consideration and opportunity. The additional ingredients of courtesy, discipline, sportsmanship and compassion, hopefully, will create a love and understanding among our junior golfers. Our foundation is proud to dedicate itself to these beliefs.

What it reported doing in 2019

The len ross - fresno city junior amateur championship golf tournament is held each spring break. Lunch is provided each day to all the children, fees are waived, and equipment provided to children in need. A clinic is held during the tournament and an awards banquet is held at the conclusion. In 2019, 127 children participated in the tournament.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 54
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.