Fresno Cycling Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770140291
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5593554874
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,055
Expenses
$107,901
Assets
$27,114

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENNIS BALL (President)
  • JANET MANUSZAK-LUCIDO (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DENNIS BALL (President)
  • JANET MANUSZAK-LUCIDO (Vice President)
  • MARY STUBBLEFIELD (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote bicycling as a sport that provides social and healthful recreation and a viable means of alternate transportation. To promote safe, lawful, and courteous travel on the road. To offer assistance to the community and other governmental agencies to promote bicycling in way that is mutually beneficial to cyclists and non-cyclists.

What it reported doing in 2024

1.the climb to kaiser and double century brought riders from all of California and other u.s. Locations to enjoy the san joaquin valley and the sierras. The events promoted the sport of bicycling, bicycling safety and encouraged safe use of the public roads.2. Continuous advocacy for bike trails, bike lanes on public roads, trail consolidation, use of helmets and general understanding that cyclists belong on the road as well as cars.3.we join other cycling clubs and organizations in the fresno area and outside to promote the sport of cycling. This includes races and charitable events. We also provide sanitary services on popular routes to keep the roadside properly clean and safe.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 71.3%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.9% of revenue deployed · 71.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.