Fresh Impact Church
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472158134
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Pearland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2819015577
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $220,564
- Expenses
- $200,048
- Assets
- $94,114
- Liabilities
- $108,300
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Tyrone D Lane (Director): $29,469 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Located in beautiful Pearland, Fresh Impact Church is a loving, Christ-centered community. We are a group of people who desire to impact the community, families and individuals in a positive, real way through the love of Jesus Christ. We believe every day is an adventure meant to be lived with passion & purpose.
What it reported doing in 2021
Worship services & ministry programs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, 0% for grants, and 25% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.2%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $32.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.2% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $144K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $29K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.