Fresh Films

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320246706
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Rock Island, IL, USA
Phone
7739367096
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Film, Video

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,188,342
Expenses
$3,146,581
Assets
$1,869,190
Liabilities
$105,515

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KELLI FEIGLEY (CEO)
  • ESTLIN FEIGLEY (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ESTLIN FEIGLEY (PRESIDENT): $172,728 total reported compensation
  • KELLI FEIGLEY (CEO): $147,081 total reported compensation
  • KEVIN WADEN (CFO/DIRECTOR/SECRETARY): $116,959 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fresh films' (the organization) mission is to change the trajectory of underserved youth through engaging them in the creative and technical processes of filmmaking; filmmaking is our vehicle for mentorship, leadership, and workforce development among teens. The program serves diverse underserved teens of all ethnicities, genders, backgrounds, and experience levels.

What it reported doing in 2025

Fresh films works with underserved teens and young adults ages 14-26 to build their technical skills, career and life skills (21st century skills), confidence and realization of their own future potential through actively involving them in the collaborative, creative and technical processes of filmmaking- filmmaking is our vehicle for mentorship, leadership and workforce development among teens. The program serves diverse underserved teens of all ethnicities, genders, backgrounds, and experience levels. The program goal is to build career pathways, job opportunities and college readiness for the $771b media/entertainment industry that is growing rapidly due to non-traditional video producers, the growth of traditional producers for digital demand as well as the growth of visual communications across social media and other platforms. The 3-leveled learning program operates at 28 physical sites + 3 virtual sites which includes after-school and evening filmmaking, summer workplace experiences and paid internships. Wrap around supports including speaker and soft-skills workshops compliment the tech learning.fresh films revenue comes from corporate and foundation grants, program sponsorship, government grants and united way grants. Program expenses to engage, mentor and train 400+ teens and young adults per year in weekly program plus on-set or digital content summer experiences, speaker sessions and soft-skills workshops, and upper level internships include staff and teaching artists, curriculum creation and implementation, equipment and supplies, travel and all program coordination with site locations, instructors, youth and their parents.staff includes 9 full-time staff, 35 part-time staff and instructors, and 5-7 paid college interns. Staff includes an executive creative director/film director, managing director/development, director of development, youth outreach, producer, production assistant and editor who work on all projects and curriculum and travel to those programs that are outside our headquarters in rock island, il. Fresh films hires freelance film professionals such as a director of photography for apprenticeship programs just like other film companies in the industry. We also have a local filmmaker/teacher artist in each city to work with the teens on the weekly program. Equipment and supplies include all camera, sound, lighting and other film and editing equipment as well as props, costumes, on-set food, and other needs needed to train the youth and produce the films in the multiple locations. Some equipment is donated or loaned to us at no charge. Travel is mostly summer local transportation to help teens get from their homes to the film sets and/or to paid internships and out-of-town travel. Expenses also include the paid internship stipends for the teen filmmakers. General expenses include accounting, legal and insurance across all programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 61
  • Accountability: 67
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $173K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.