Fresh Breath International Worship Center Inc

Legal name: Fresh Breath International Worship Workship Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800622427
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4076926326
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$424,156
Expenses
$642,729
Assets
$113,983
Liabilities
$41,148

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL INGS (President)
  • NOAMI INGS (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANIEL INGS (President): $55,000 total reported compensation
  • NOAMI INGS (Vice President): $36,000 total reported compensation
  • TANISHIA SMITH (Treasurer): $30,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Boys 2 Men Mentoring provides community-based mentoring for teenage boys, ages 10-18, on their journey to manhood. Our mentoring program offers a comprehensive approach to personal and community development. Through a combination of group and one-on-one mentoring sessions, your child will receive tailored guidance to enhance various aspects of their lives. Boys 2 Men Mentoring goes beyond traditional mentorship by incorporating a health and wellness component, Fit4Life, which promotes mental, physical, and spiritual well-being.

What it reported doing in 2025

Boys 2 Men Mentoring provides community-based mentoring services for boys and young men ages 10 to 18. The organization supports participants in their transition to adulthood through structured group mentoring, one-on-one mentoring, leadership development, life skills training, academic support, and character-building activities designed to promote positive personal growth and community engagement. Fit4Lyfe East/West Program Supported through grant funding, the Fit4Lyfe program promotes physical, mental, and emotional wellness among participants. The program incorporates fitness activities, health education, mentorship, and wellness initiatives that encourage healthy lifestyles and positive decision-making. L.E.A.D. Parent Advocacy Program Supported through grant funding, the L.E.A.D. program provides parent advocacy and support services designed to strengthen family engagement and promote positive outcomes for youth. The program fosters collaboration between parents, mentors, and community resources to support family growth and youth development. Summer Enrichment Program Funded through grants, donations, and parent contributions, the Summer Enrichment Program brings together participants from both the East and West mentoring programs for a four-day educational experience. Activities include fitness training, leadership development, life skills instruction, educational field trips, mentoring sessions, and academic preparation for the upcoming school year. S.T.E.A.M. Program Supported through East and West grant funding, the S.T.E.A.M. Program provides instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics. Beginning in January 2026, the program serves participants in both regions and offers hands-on learning experiences that promote creativity, innovation, critical thinking, and career exploration. Mission Tour Program Funded through donations and fundraising efforts, the Mission Tour Program provides educational, leadership, cultural, and community service experiences. The Jamaica mission experience serves as an extension of the Boys 2 Men College and Career Exposure Initiative and helps participants develop leadership abilities, cultural awareness, workforce readiness skills, and a commitment to community service. College Tour Program Supported through donations, parent contributions, and fundraising activities, the College Tour Program exposes participants to higher education institutions and career pathways. Through campus visits and educational experiences, the program encourages academic achievement, broadens career awareness, and inspires participants to pursue post-secondary education and professional opportunities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 77% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 23
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.2%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 62.1%; rating input score 62
  • Fundraising efficiency: $81.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -51.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.2% of revenue deployed · 62.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $399K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.