Fremont Rush Soccer Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862026633
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fremont, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5107076004
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $966,109
- Expenses
- $966,262
- Assets
- $5,152
- Liabilities
- $2,642
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Fernando Colmenares (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Fernando Colmenares (CEO)
- Janell Kelley (Secretary)
- Mathias K Vavao (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fremont Rush Soccer is dedicated to providing an unmatched soccer experience for all individuals with an interest in the game. Their organization emphasizes the development of character, the thrill of competition, and the importance of pure enjoyment. They take it upon themselves to instill valuable life lessons in their athletes, both on and off the field. Their belief is that every player should have an equal opportunity to explore their potential and take part in challenging circumstances that lead to positive outcomes. They are fully committed to ensuring that soccer is a safe, enjoyable, and fulfilling experience for all, regardless of age or skill level. With exceptional coaching, effective leadership, and genuine sincerity, Fremont Rush Soccer, is dedicated to becoming the world's leading soccer club while also fostering exceptional citizenship in their players.
What it reported doing in 2024
Organized soccer programs for children and youth in both recreational and competitive play, maintaining high standards of safety and coaching support while ensuring an educational and enriching experience for all players who participated.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -58.1% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $773K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.