Mercyhealth

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363290904
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Freeport, IL, USA
Phone
(888) 39-MERCY
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,791,477
Expenses
$70,026,349
Assets
$48,672,326
Liabilities
$44,639,081

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK GRIDLEY (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • BETH KALNINS MD (PRESIDENT MEDICAL STAFF)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARK GRIDLEY (PRESIDENT/CEO): $788,822 total reported compensation
  • PRASAD KILARU (PHYSICIAN): $773,794 total reported compensation
  • BARRY BARNES (PHYSICIAN): $730,619 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the health and well-being of the communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality healthcare services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Fhn operates and/or supports a variety of community benefit programs that included but were not limited to the following: community health education programs: as part of fhn's commitment to providing health education to area communities, fhn provided numerous community education events and school health programs and support group events. The estimated direct and indirect costs of these programs and development of resources were approximately $46,000.community-based clinical services: as part of fhn's mission to improve health, fhn and the stephenson county health department have partnered to provide primary health care services to anyone in need of medical care at the fhn community healthcare center. Approximately 2,500 patient visits were provided in 2024. Services offered include diagnosis and treatment of common acute illnesses as well as management of chronic health problems, including nurse practitioner exams and consultations, lab tests, x-rays and health education.fhn also provided 3,910 health screens and sports physicals, 551 hours of conditioning and training support and sports medicine trainers at several events. The estimated direct and indirect costs of these programs were approximately $406,000.health care support services: since community members may require different types of assistance, fhn provides information and referral services, translation services and transportation assistance. The estimated direct and indirect costs of these programs were approximately $74,000. Health professional education: fhn supports the training of health care professionals by providing scholarships, clinical settings and supervision to non-fhn employees. The estimated direct and indirect costs of these programs were approximately $274,000.financial contributions: fhn recognizes the importance of giving back to the community through charitable organization and others involved in promoting health and wellness in our community. In 2024, fhn provided support to a number of community groups through direct financial contributions and providing rooms or staff time. The estimated direct and indirect costs of these programs were approximately $87,000.community-building activities: fhn values the contributions and efforts of other organizations in improving the health of our communities. As such, fhn provided financial and in-kind support to assist other local community development organizations. The estimated direct and indirect costs of these programs were approximately $46,000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 95
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 66.6%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -56.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.92; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 66.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $46.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $789K · 25 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.8M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.