Freedom to Work Advocacy Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454294795
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
9175668870
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Lesbian, Gay Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,000
Expenses
$151,917
Assets
$52,003
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TICO ALMEIDA (PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)

People named in this filing

  • TICO ALMEIDA (PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY)
  • GEORGE ROBERTS (TREASURER)
  • JOSEPH SCAVETTA (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Freedom to work advocacy fund, inc. Is a national organization committed to banning workplace harassment and career discrimination against lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and transgender americans by passing the federal employment non-discrimination act (enda) and other federal policies that ensure lgbt workplace fairness.

What it reported doing in 2014

Freedom to work advocacy fund, inc. Advocated for the president of the united states to sign an executive order banning lgbt workplace discrimination at the companies that receive federal contracts, and also advocated for the employment non-discrimination act.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -51.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 64.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 43.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $139K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.