Frederick County Healthcare Coalition Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270492113
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Frederick, MD, USA
- Phone
- 2405663558
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $226,405
- Expenses
- $319,568
- Assets
- $230,368
- Liabilities
- $169,713
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PILAR OLIVO (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINA BROCKETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MALCOLM FURGOL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MALCOLM FURGOL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $127,398 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to improve wellness and resiliency to equitably impact the lifelong health of all frederick county residents
What it reported doing in 2024
The local health improvement plan (lhip) identifies the priorities from the community health needs assessment (chna) and designs the roadmap to bring that plan into action.our coalition provides a structure for organizations to collaborate on each of the health priorities, which during fy2025 included adverse childhood experiences, type 2 diabetes and mental health, called "planning workgroups." each workgroup has a lead facilitator from one of our partner organizations, a coordinator from our coalition, and a framework to make actionable change.health improvement process1.assess health of community2.determine priorities for health improvement3.create plan which includes implementing programs or policies4.evaluate and share the impact of programs or policies5.repeat cycleform 990, part iii, line 4a, description of program service: relationship between frederick county healthcare coalition andfrederick health inc.(EIN 52-0591612)frederick county healthcare coalition (fchcc), a non-profitorganization that manages the county local healthcare improvementprocess (lhip) in collaboration with frederick health, a hospitallicensed by the state of Maryland, have entered into a memorandum ofunderstanding in which both parties agree to advance the health of allfrederick county residents and provide the foundation for the thrivingcommunity and economy to the extent permitted under applicable law.fchcc is undertaking several key deliverables, including infusinghealth equity throughout the lhip and workgroup implementation plans, providing opportunities for diverse parts of the community toparticipate in the health planning process, ensuring effectivestrategic communications, providing adminstrative support andimplementation funds for each lhip public priority workshop, andpreparing and executing a mass marketing and communications plan forthe health solutions produced by the lhip public health priority workgroups. In turn, frederick health will provide management of thegrant agreement with frederick county government, including but notlimited to administration, program management and accounting services, as well as financial reporting to comply with federal auditingrequirements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -41.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $277K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $127K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.