Frazee Firefighter's Relief Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411323990
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Frazee, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2183346266
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,059
- Expenses
- $75,970
- Assets
- $840,635
- Liabilities
- $6,493
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRAVIS GRAY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TRAVIS GRAY (PRESIDENT): $500 total reported compensation
- ALBERT DOLL (TREASURER): $500 total reported compensation
- CHAD MITCHELL (PAST-PRESIDE): $183 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide reiterment, death, and disability benefits to volunteer firefighters associated with the frazee fire department
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided financial support from the association's general fund to organizations in the frazee area
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 63% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 68.2%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.7%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.07; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58% of revenue deployed · 68.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $500 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.