Fraternal Order of Police West Palm Beach Lodge

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237194099
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
West Palm Beach, FL, USA
Phone
5614258451
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$265,468
Expenses
$265,525
Assets
$640,968
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADAM MYERS (PRESIDENT)
  • JIM SNIFFEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DUSTEN CAMPBELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ADAM MYERS (PRESIDENT)
  • JIM SNIFFEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DUSTEN CAMPBELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support police officers and their families that are in need; support other not for profit organizations; provide other support for police officers

What it reported doing in 2022

Dues from active police officers to pay state and federal dues

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Multi-channel. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 28% for direct work, 17% for grants, and 55% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 51
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 450 of 450 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 20 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.